Home › Free RES exam questions › Lesson 10: Legislation
Free RES exam practice · Paper 2

Legislation: RES exam practice questions

10 free questions on strata management, the Residential Property Act, anti-money laundering, land acquisition, PDPA and Do Not Call, CPFTA and small claims. Try each one, then tap “Show answer” for the answer and why the other options are wrong.

Question 1BeginnerStrata titles & the MCST

When the strata title plan of a new condominium is registered, a management corporation is constituted. Its members are __________.

  1. Aall the subsidiary proprietors of the lots in the strata title plan
  2. Bthe council members elected at each annual general meeting
  3. Cthe developer and the managing agent it has appointed
  4. Dall residents of the development, including tenants
Show answer

Answer: A. all the subsidiary proprietors of the lots in the strata title plan

Under the Land Titles (Strata) Act and the BMSMA (renamed the Building (Strata Management) Act 2004 from 1 October 2025), the management corporation (MCST) consists of all the subsidiary proprietors (owners) of the lots from time to time, and is named “The Management Corporation — Strata Title Plan No. __”. The council is only a body elected from among the owners, and tenants are not members.

Question 2BeginnerShare value

Using the standard residential share value guideline (5 for 50 m² or less, 6 for 51–100 m², and 1 more for each further 50 m²), a 135 m² apartment has a share value of __________.

  1. A7
  2. B6
  3. C8
  4. D13
Show answer

Answer: A. 7

135 m² falls in the 101–150 m² band, which carries a share value of 7. 6 is for 51–100 m² and 8 for 151–200 m²; share value is not the floor area divided by 10.

Question 3BeginnerResolutions & general meetings

A motion is passed as a special resolution if, on a poll, the share values of the lots voting for it are at least __________ of the share values of all lots for which valid votes are cast by owners present in person or by proxy.

  1. A75%
  2. B50%
  3. C80%
  4. D90%
Show answer

Answer: A. 75%

A special resolution needs at least 75% of the share values of the valid votes cast, at a meeting held on the 22nd day or later after notice of the motion. 90% is for a 90% resolution, and a simple majority for an ordinary resolution.

Question 4BeginnerBy-laws, improvements & defects

To make a new by-law, for example on the keeping of pets, a management corporation must pass __________ and lodge a copy with the Commissioner of Buildings.

  1. Aa special resolution
  2. Ban ordinary resolution
  3. Ca 90% resolution
  4. Da unanimous resolution
Show answer

Answer: A. a special resolution

Section 32 allows by-laws to be made, amended or repealed by special resolution; they have no effect until a copy is lodged with the Commissioner of Buildings, which must be done by the 45th day after the resolution. An ordinary resolution suffices only for limited matters, such as parking lots fitted with EV chargers.

Question 5BeginnerApproval to buy restricted property

According to SLA, the main criteria for a foreign person’s application to buy a landed home on the main island are that he __________.

  1. Ahas been a Singapore PR for at least 5 years and makes an exceptional economic contribution to Singapore
  2. Bhas lived in Singapore for at least 2 years on any long-term pass and has no criminal record here or overseas
  3. Cholds an Employment Pass and agrees to pay the Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty
  4. Dis married to a Singapore citizen, whatever his own residency status
Show answer

Answer: A. has been a Singapore PR for at least 5 years and makes an exceptional economic contribution to Singapore

SLA assesses each case on its merits, mainly looking for at least 5 years as a PR and an exceptional economic contribution (for example, employment income assessable to tax here). Older descriptions of this criterion refer to an “adequate” contribution; SLA now says “exceptional”.

Question 6BeginnerInheritance & loss of status

A Singapore citizen who bought a landed house and later renounces his citizenship must sell it to a citizen or approved purchaser within __________ of ceasing to be a citizen, unless the Minister allows a longer period.

  1. A2 years
  2. B6 months
  3. C5 years
  4. D10 years
Show answer

Answer: A. 2 years

Section 3A of the Residential Property Act gives former citizens and former PRs 2 years to sell restricted residential property. The 5-year period is for personal representatives to sell a foreign beneficiary’s inherited interest.

Question 7IntermediateDNC Registry checks

Tan Mei Ling, 34, a salesperson with a mid-sized estate agency, has just been appointed by Mr and Mrs Subramaniam to sell their newly renovated 3-room resale flat in Clementi, a short walk from the MRT station. Keen to generate interest before an open house on Saturday, 10 October 2026, she pays an online vendor $300 for a list of 2,000 mobile numbers said to belong to “Clementi homeowners”. The vendor’s website describes its lists as “PDPA-friendly”. Mei Ling has had no previous dealings with any of the owners on the list. She drafts an SMS describing the flat, its asking price of $520,000 and her contact details, ending with the line “Reply STOP to opt out”, and plans to send it to every number that evening.

Before sending the SMS messages, what should Mei Ling do to comply with the Do Not Call provisions of the PDPA?

  1. ACheck each number against the No Text Message Register, relying only on a result obtained within the 21 days before sending, and leave out listed numbers unless the owner has clearly consented
  2. BRely on the vendor’s assurance that the list is “PDPA-friendly”, since a person who buys a list from a vendor is not the party responsible for complying with the DNC rules
  3. CCheck each number against the No Voice Call Register within the 21 days before sending and skip listed numbers, since a text message about a listing is treated in the same way as a telephone call
  4. DAdd a clear opt-out line to every message and stop messaging any owner within 21 days of a request, since an opt-out facility takes the place of a registry check
Show answer

Answer: A. Check each number against the No Text Message Register, relying only on a result obtained within the 21 days before sending, and leave out listed numbers unless the owner has clearly consented

Offering a listing to individuals promotes a service, so each SMS is a specified message. Under section 43 of the PDPA, Mei Ling, as the sender, needs valid confirmation from a check made within the 21 days before sending that each number is not on the relevant register, which for an SMS is the No Text Message Register, unless the owner has given clear and unambiguous consent. Buying the list from a vendor does not shift her duty, the No Voice Call Register is the wrong register for texts, and an opt-out line does not replace the check. The open house date, the asking price and the flat’s renovation have no bearing on the answer.

Question 8IntermediateSentosa Cove

Mr Julien Laurent, 45, a French national, has been a Singapore permanent resident for 7 years and is a senior banker whose high income is taxed in Singapore. He and his wife, also a French national, have two young children at an international school. The family already owns a condominium unit at Tanjong Rhu, which they plan to keep and let out once they move. Mr Laurent now wants to buy a detached house at Sentosa Cove with a land area of 1,650 m², for the family to live in. A friend who bought a Sentosa Cove apartment two years ago tells him that “everything at Sentosa Cove is open to foreigners, so no approval is needed”, and offers to introduce him to her own lawyer.

What should Mr Laurent’s salesperson advise him about the Sentosa Cove house?

  1. AHe needs LDAU approval, as the house is restricted residential property, and at 1,650 m² the plot is within the 1,800 m² land area limit that applies at Sentosa Cove
  2. BHe needs no approval, as Sentosa Cove has been set aside for foreign buyers, so his friend is right that its landed homes are open to him in the same way as its apartments
  3. CHe needs LDAU approval, but at 1,650 m² the plot exceeds the 15,000 sq ft guide, which SLA applies at Sentosa Cove in the same way as on the main island
  4. DHe needs approval from the Sentosa Development Corporation, which decides all applications by foreign persons to buy landed homes at Sentosa Cove, up to a limit of 1,800 m²
Show answer

Answer: A. He needs LDAU approval, as the house is restricted residential property, and at 1,650 m² the plot is within the 1,800 m² land area limit that applies at Sentosa Cove

Landed homes at Sentosa Cove are restricted residential property, so a foreign person, including a PR, needs approval from SLA’s LDAU; SLA limits such homes to a land area of 1,800 m², and 1,650 m² is within it. The 15,000 sq ft (about 1,393.5 m²) guide is for restricted property on the main island. The friend’s remark is true only of Sentosa Cove apartments, which are non-restricted. Any approval will require the house to be used only for the family’s own occupation. His Tanjong Rhu condominium unit, which he may keep and let, does not affect the answer.

Question 9IntermediateHarbouring offences

Mr Seah Boon Kiat, 67, lets the common bedroom of his 5-room flat in Ang Mo Kio to Mr Rahim, a construction worker from Bangladesh, at $700 a month. Before the tenancy began in September 2025, Mr Seah inspected Mr Rahim’s original Work Permit card, matched it with his passport and verified it with the SGWorkPass app, and he kept copies of all three. Mr Rahim has always paid the rent on time and gets on well with Mr Seah’s wife. In August 2026, while helping Mr Rahim fill in a form, Mr Seah notices that the Work Permit expired two months earlier. Mr Rahim says his employer is “sorting it out”, and Mr Seah, not wanting to lose a reliable tenant, lets him stay on.

What is Mr Seah’s position under the Immigration Act?

  1. AHe risks prosecution for harbouring knowingly or with reckless disregard, with a presumptive minimum of 6 months’ jail and up to 2 years, and a fine of up to $6,000
  2. BHe risks prosecution only for negligent harbouring, with a fine of up to $6,000, up to 12 months’ jail, or both, because he made all three checks at the start
  3. CHe commits no offence, because he carried out all three prescribed checks when the tenancy began and kept copies of the card, passport and app result as evidence of his due diligence
  4. DHe commits no offence, because the employer rather than the landlord is responsible for a worker whose Work Permit has expired while a renewal is still being sorted out
Show answer

Answer: A. He risks prosecution for harbouring knowingly or with reckless disregard, with a presumptive minimum of 6 months’ jail and up to 2 years, and a fine of up to $6,000

Due diligence must show that the pass was valid at the material time, so checks made when the tenancy began do not help once Mr Seah knows the permit has expired. Continuing to give shelter with that knowledge is harbouring knowingly or with reckless disregard under section 57, carrying a presumptive minimum of 6 months’ and up to 2 years’ imprisonment, plus a fine of up to $6,000. The lighter negligent-harbouring tier does not fit a landlord who knows, and the employer’s promise to sort things out is no defence. The tenant’s punctual rent and good relations are irrelevant.

Question 10IntermediateSection 47 information & collective sales

Ms Kavitha Rao, 38, a teacher, has been granted an option to purchase a 3-bedroom unit at Sunview Gardens, a 20-year-old condominium in Pasir Ris, for $1,280,000. During a second viewing, her salesperson, Daniel Koh, chats with a neighbour at the lift lobby, who says the seller “hasn’t paid the maintenance fees since the start of the year” and that the MCST has put up a notice about arrears. The seller’s salesperson assures Daniel in a WhatsApp message that “everything is paid up”. Ms Rao, who is also considering a cheaper unit two blocks away and has already obtained approval in principle for her loan, asks Daniel how she can be sure she will not end up paying the seller’s arrears after she takes over the unit.

What should Daniel advise Ms Rao to do?

  1. AHave her lawyer apply to the MCST for a section 47 certificate of contributions and arrears, which is conclusive evidence in her favour as a purchaser as at its date
  2. BDo nothing further, since unpaid contributions remain the seller’s personal debt to the MCST and cannot become the liability of a buyer who later takes over the unit from him
  3. CRely on the WhatsApp message, since a written confirmation from the seller’s salesperson binds the MCST as to the amount of any arrears on the unit
  4. DSearch SLA’s title records, since unpaid MCST contributions must be registered against the strata title of the unit before the MCST can recover them
Show answer

Answer: A. Have her lawyer apply to the MCST for a section 47 certificate of contributions and arrears, which is conclusive evidence in her favour as a purchaser as at its date

Under section 40 of the BMSMA, a new owner can be jointly and severally liable with the former owner for contributions that were unpaid when she becomes the owner, subject to a section 47 certificate. A prospective purchaser, usually through her lawyer, may apply to the MCST for the certificate, which is conclusive evidence of the contributions and arrears as at its date in favour of a purchaser for value. A salesperson’s message does not bind the MCST, and arrears are not found by a title search. The neighbour’s gossip, the price and the other unit she is considering do not change this.

104 questions on Legislation in the app

Option to Pass has 1,850+ original questions across all 16 chapters at three levels, 80+ case studies and two full mock papers in the real exam format. Lesson 1A is free, with no sign-up.

More free questions for Paper 2